Home
"42 STORY HOUSE"
The Stories My Bio Making Of
How To Buy



The Making Of "42 STORY HOUSE"

Green Screen

From "When God Drinks" (A Special Effects Extravaganza).  My favorite "behind the scenes" shot.  I'm pretty sure this is how ILM got started.


Part 1:  What This Movie Is


Here's the thing:  I've been writing scripts, mostly unsuccessfully, for a very long time (way to sell it, Todd!).  During most of that very long time, I've told myself, "I should really just go ahead and make a damn movie."  Well, in recent years, technology has finally shamed me into it.  Cost is no longer the limiting factor, it's time.  So I decided to take a year, buy a (not great but decent) camera, learn a (surprisingly powerful) consumer editing program, and see what I could put together.

The result is "42 STORY HOUSE".

Holding dear the axiom, "The enemy of art is the absence of limitations," I set myself two pretty big limitations:

1.  Everything had to be shot at one location.
2.  Everything had to be done by one person.

Why?  Because I wasn't ready to do the "marshaling the troops" all-consuming indie feature (yet).  Besides, I wanted to see if I even liked doing any of this before I dragged other people into the process.

That's why I decided to do a series of shorts instead of one continuous storyline.  That way, I could write, shoot, and edit in small self-contained chunks - which is another way of saying I could make the least commitment and abandon ship anytime I wanted.

But I didn't abandon ship.  In fact, I didn't stop sailing until I had 90 minutes of material:  42 shorts, most of them 1-4 minutes in length (so if you don't like one, stick around, there'll be another).  Elapsed life time?  About a year.

Most of these shorts originated by simply looking around and asking, "How can I make this common household item into a (hopefully) funny story?"  Surprisingly, the answer often involved anthropomorphizing elements of the house and putting its tenant (me) in danger (blame Plato, not Freud; stories require conflict).

The shorts can be watched all at once or one at a time.  It doesn't matter.  It also doesn't matter whether you're laughing with them or at them, as long as you're laughing.

It's (hopefully) Comedy.

That's what this movie is.


Front Yard Standup

From "Unclear On The Concept".  If my neighbors are any indication, the idea of performing (amplified) standup comedy in one's front yard isn't likely to catch on.


Part 2:  What This Movie Isn't


Slick.

This isn't Hollywood production values.  In fact, this isn't even typical low budget production values.  Why not?  Let me bullet-point the ways:

- No HD:  Meaning "high definition".  This movie is rather best described as BD ("barely definition").  I used a "prosumer" type camera with 3 CCD's which is a cut above the one you use to shoot your kid's birthday parties.  However, the couple extra CCD's mainly mean the color rendering is a little better.  And while I tried to use a few filters and even a lighting kit, the truth is the pictures are mostly of an amateur-really-trying-hard-but-not-quite-making-it quality.

- No Dolby:  I didn't record for home theater surround sound.  In fact, I was usually pretty happy just to get intelligible sound (about 98% of the time).  Often, I threw up my hands, shot MOS, and built the entire soundtrack from scratch (dialogue, sound effects, music).  I understand that, as far as "no budget" movies go, people will put up with a certain lack of picture quality, but bad sound is a deal breaker.  I've tried to take this into account.  Still, I doubt the THX people are losing sleep.

- No Widescreen:  This movie was shot in a standard, old-fashioned 4:3 aspect ratio, the kind that fits on a standard, old-fashioned TV.  Why?  Because this movie was never meant to be projected.  It will never be seen in a movie theater.  It was meant to be enjoyed directly by you, and maybe a few of your friends and family (Comedy loves Company).  And, frankly, because shots of my bathroom didn't warrant panoramic VistaVision.

Bottom Line?

There are definitely technical shortcomings in this movie.  I tried to make up for it with a few (ultimately, cheesy) effects and a lot of (what I thought was) fancy editing.  But what this movie isn't is Slick.  Content was far more important than Presentation.

Which you might actually enjoy for a change.


Rooftop Camera

From "The Danger Of Cutting Mythology Class".  Note the camera on the roof.  I learned the hard way not to use a tripod that can be blown over by a stiff wind.


Part 3:  What This Movie Is, Part II


To Summarize:

"The enemy of art is the absence of limitations."

"42 STORY HOUSE" has many limitations.

Therefore:

"42 STORY HOUSE" is...

...not art.  You can't put a price on art.

This is 10 bucks.


Knife In Back

From "The 1-Second Story".  Here I create a visual metaphor for my career in Hollywood.


Previous Page          Next Page



Watch the Trailer!


Read the Reviews!


If you're ready to buy (All right, all right.  It's your money.  Who am I to argue with your mad, impetuous ways?) then click this button... Thanks!


Questions?  Comments?  (Automatically Kill-Filtered) Complaints? todd@42storyhouse.com